|
|
|
About us Poducts Applications Training Support Press Room & Events Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Virtual
Spray Drying |
|
|
|
|
Spray drying is used to turn a liquid into a powder: examples being detergents, herbal extracts, instant coffee and milk. These systems have design critical parameters which historically have been optimized through expensive and time consuming physical testing. The material residence time is paramount: it must be long enough to remove moisture but not so long as to cause over-heating. Optimizing the drying process is non-trivial, since it is dependant on a number of factors. These include: flow regime, temperature distribution in the system, humidity, initial particle temperature and moisture content, and particle drying characteristics. |
|
||||
|
A
key strength of CFD is the ability to carry out ¡°what-if¡± and
optimization analyses quickly. As an example, a dryer with a given
set of feed conditions was considered. CFD simulations were carried
out with the aim to find the optimum condition for the drying air.
Key information of interest to the plant operator was extracted
from the CFD results and presented in percentages of particles leaving
the particle and air exits, and the particle conditions at these
exits in terms of mean diameter, temperature and moisture content.
From these results, the operator of the dryer can easily select
the optimum operating condition, which allows him to achieve the
desired product quality at minimum cost. CD-adapco has long identified industry¡¯s requirement for process specific tools: termed ¡®es¡¯ (Expert System) solutions. The model for these tools is that they encapsulate the CFD set-up, running and post-processing process, in an environment that is accessible to design engineers without specialist training. Thus, the requisite knowledge-transfer to get new starters up, running and adding value to the design process is greatly reduced. The prerequisites to produce such a tool are twofold. First, you must be familiar with the design process in question. Second, you must be familiar with the modeling software and algorithms. This is where the partnership between CD-adapco and NIZO is so important. CD-adapco is a CAE company – now in its 25th year – of unparalleled experience and expertise. NIZO has been researching spray drying since the 1950s and has extensive experimental, pilot plant and real plant operating experience. In this, experimental data used for validating CFD results is included Together, they have produced es-spraydry. The modeling process In every CFD analysis it is necessary to go through several steps to build the computational model, carry out the computation and analyze the results as follow: |
|||||
|
1. Define the
shape and dimensions of the dryer; |
|
||||
|
This
sequence of steps provides us with a well defined methodology for
applying CFD in spray drying analyses. This methodology has been
encapsulated, with the steps defined above automated, paying particular
attention to ensure that the inputs and outputs are engineering
values rather than CFD-speak. This was achieved through close collaboration
with NIZO design engineers. Therefore, the end result from an es-spraydry
simulation is not only detailed flow visualization images, but also
an automatically generated report, providing engineers with the
all important design metrics. Figure 2 also demonstrates the level of detailed understanding yielded by CFD analyses. As shown, such information can be obtained from experimental work, but only on highly idealized geometries and even then at great cost. |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
From the es-spraydry results we monitored the particle conditions exiting the dryer at the particle and air exits. Several es-spraydry calculations were performed with different air flow rates. The results were further analyzed against the operation requirements, shown graphically in Figures 4 to 6. From the analysis we would select an air flow rate of 55,000 kg/h for minimum operating cost in terms of supplying the drying air. The es-spraydry model used in the analysis has 20902 cells. 100 parcels of droplets were used to represent the spray. Converged solutions for all cases were obtained within 200 iterations. The CPU times for the cases range from 4000 to 7555 seconds on an Intel P3, 1.2GHz computer. Conclusion With
this simulation tool it is now possible for the spray dryer operators
to carry out systemic analyses of their dryers to ensure they operate
at optimal conditions. |
|||||
|
|
|
About
us Products
Applications
Training
Support
Press
Room & Events
Consulting
°³ÀÎÁ¤º¸¹æÄ§ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||